Thank you for Subscribing to Business Management Review Weekly Brief
I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info
Thank you for Subscribing to Business Management Review Weekly Brief
By
Business Management Review | Tuesday, December 07, 2021
Many disputes exist about BYOD, CYOD, and COPE. Which one to choose? Which mobility strategy will become more productive and more employee satisfaction?
FREMONT, CA: As people seem more hooked to their mobile phones with each passing day, it has to turn essential for companies to take care of their employees' desires and comfort zones to boost productivity. Then these three schools of thought appeared to deal with the spectrum of employees' freedom and align them with the enterprise's needs, business policies, budgets, culture, and other considerations.
1. BYOD (Bring your device): The Key to Employee Satisfaction
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
BYOD is familiar and the most popular approach adopted by businesses. In this method, the employees have complete freedom to choose and support the device they wish to use at the workplace. This approach is mainly adopted by small businesses and companies that deal with less sensitive information.
Enterprises, particularly mid-sized, use the BYOD approach to cut costs and enhance productivity. Field reps use their smartphones and are happier to use them than the one issued by the company. Still, there is the absence of a learning curve here. The employees can improve their phones to get cutting-edge technology, which indirectly benefits the company.
BYOD also helps organizations appear more competitive in the market regarding potential employees. Based on a report, 35% of workers accept that the enterprise's BYOD policy influences their decision to accept or decline the job offer.
CYOD (Choose your device): Authority comes at a Cost
CYOD is a merged approach adopted by companies. They offer their employees a limited array of devices that the enterprise has approved for reliability, durability, and security. This gives some degree of freedom to the employees and allows the companies to have more hold over them. The devices are waged for and controlled by the employees. The organization will give employees a renewable hardware stipend, and they can own them until their termination or resignation.
Then comes the cost factor. It is vital to boost the devices, which becomes hard as manufacturers like Apple keep rolling out new products yearly.
COPE (Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled): Uniformity at the Cost of Privacy
This is the most expensive but safest option for organizations. It is the closest model to the conventional business model of COBE (Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled). It is more possible to be used by large enterprises as it enhances control over the devices in many ways. Every employee is given the instruments of the same model, which they can use for their work. However, the company will ultimately decide what freedom and choice should be given to employees.
The problem with COPE is that it allows IT to look into the workers' personal information, which might be believed to be a breach of privacy. Nevertheless, the benefit of COPE over BYOD and CYOD is the lower security concerns as organizations exercise more authority and rule over all the devices through this approach. Therefore, financial institutions and healthcare sectors mostly select this method.
The definitions and features of each of these vary slightly. Therefore, enterprises must consider which strategy best suits their management before choosing these approaches.
More in News